FRANKNESS: SERVING US ALL? Right.

Contribution to a new level of discourse or d’Nile. (Sent to local paper, 6-29-04, Unedited, aside from the appropriate changes in connection with the additions in italics.)

Maureen Dowd sure hit the nail on the head in "Is Cheney losing it?" and I would like to tack on a few of my own. Aside from wondering if Cheney ever really had it, as the media should know he was not one for mincing words during the campaign. The candidate Bush even concurred with his ticket-mate’s aphorism for a member of the press. That is the irony that un-minced words should get out of this administration.

After all, the president did call for Hollywood to come up with some scenarios and solutions after 9-11. He just didn’t know, read or remember the works of the creative thinkers in his administration from the neo-con philosophers to the Secretary of Infotainment Rumsfeld who said "facts change". And for the obtuse I am not equating defense with entertainment, but only in regards to his dissemination of information duties. Then there are the history "rewriters" which they eschew but now employ memo rewriters before it is determined who read or followed them or how they fit in the chain of command. From the Cheney Energy Panel or rather the "X-Files" motto that "the truth is out there" to the "Twilight Zone’s" episode "To Serve Man", Cheney has now contributed to the language of unity, not to mention great debates.

And thanks to Maureen Dowd we should remember a useful "F" word (or few words)and when disturbed cry "FOX NEWS". Then we can finally let the French off the hook. Now those who are embarrassed after a personal faux pas or outburst can just say, "Pardon my Cheney". However, for those who are proud of their verbal and debating skills, it is just about time someone let the facts slip.

I don’t know if that means we found the leak in the ship of fools or the paddle that got us up the creek. But we can probably agree it is not all down hill from here. We just may not agree on the continual trickle or flood of denial.

[4-1-08: Is Cheney Losing It? link added ]

MAY 2013 FP THREE

5-1-13:  guilt by buy (b.s.)= blog search or not S.C. Gnot!{1} Pre-knot:(b.s.) guilt+by/Running Joke(s.c.) , Now Dat's...(s.c.), Post Inserted(s.c.), Red Labeling!.  line+to+walk/ line+to+cross/  rising+tide  / swift+craft (b,c)

{1}Currently no links @G and only 1 link @ot
Late Knot.

5-10-13 Rhythm: Pre-Pan FRY. Clinton(Bill) is full of B.S.

5-15-13 (b.s.): * French not Cheney: (a.) FRANKNESS: SERVING US ALL? Right., (b.)They started it., (c.)au contraire, Clearwater muddy., Hitting Snooze Button.

5-17-13 I need boots !  But seriously folks!

5-30-13:  Between Iraq and a Hard Work!  Tan Gent shall ism ?

They started it.

See same link... I say they started it. Two realities? Rumsfeld himself said facts change as noted here before I started providing links. You can check the archives around the time you think he may have said that. Reason enough for flip-flop. But a second reason as Cheney hit it, is mutual, sort of. Since they don't do nuance everything they can't understand has flip-flop potential. They do do French as in "pardon my French" as Cheney has been caught on a podium and the senate floor referring to a journalist and later a Senator.
Well if nuance is French, then pardon my Cheney. You would think that English is Greek to them but I won't go there. No I am not being vulgar just over my head academically.

au contraire

Pardon my Cheney...(name calling and deleteds aside) it is not the "loonies" but the dis-enthused and profits of train wrecks* who may cost the Democrats.
[Post post con tent, i.e just in from my Inbox]
BTW: Cheney does not deserve a pardon, but my French does not need one.
* Barbara Walter's term for what sells or gets covered

Hitting Snooze Button

Meme or and um.

Just a little stepping back on the previous post of mine. First: it is always in the words that you find what you Google. Second: then they must still be filtered.

[ 8-20-07 * * * SEE PREVIOUS WARNING: CLICK AT YOUR OWN RISK! * * * Wake Up America * * * ] caught my interest, and hit some spots that were familiar and where I often go.

The particular page on Rove and Hillary along with the new filter as I note above, Meme or and um , spells it all out. But I still have a ways to go, and it is not that clear where it is coming from. All I can say is that it is a filter. What it fertilizes is still up to the "hard work" of the people. Which is something I need to get back to... later.

[Heck: Oh and I did not even read the reference to language [8-20-07 * * * CLICK AT OWN RISK (in comments to Wake Up America) * * * ]
and ended mine on vocabulary,
but "there I go again". [[11:08 AM Re: Bill Clinton as a cuss word versus Cheney a pardon for such, is just a hint at a difference in perspectives, which I had missed earlier. "Pardon my Cheney" as in "Pardon my French."]]
Here I will preemptively hit the nail on the head.
Mother Jones, you see hints at the point in the title. Alleged White House-Petraeus Arm Wrestling Over September Report a Ruse? At least that is my point. And TYT. From other source or my general filtering, Patraeus is dancing around "the turd blossoms" of information and politics. Now I will read the report.-
Now that I have, it comports with my opinion and the facts. One thing that must be remembered, there is no obligation to tell the truth to anyone in the media. Even the media has the right to lie. And apparently in this case there may be two stories ** both in public and behind closed doors. And this goes directly back to troop involvement with the facts and whether their opinions matter, whether they are in or out of the military.]

[10:37 AM - My initial impression needs to be filtered, as now I see that Wake Up America has a perspective that still needs more sorting...]

** This is already being denied.

Not to be full of it...

or demonstrate I Ron Knee...
but everything must be taken in context. 
In fact, WMD is an example and Weapon of Mass Distraction, Akin to E.D (entitlement distraction).
Hume or ... is an example of empiricism, and empire is not so in context. 
Pardon my tan gent, but not my French* or Cheney, let alone Rumsfeld. 

*link inserted 3-28-14 and is technically an anti-thesis. 

Clearwater muddy.

I do not know if this is the tipping point, but the gloves are certainly off, and it has only just begun.

One thing that must be kept in mind is that not only must the political fight be carried forward but the job still must be done by those already there.

The "fudging" or lack of clarity that Bush needs is the point, and the "fudging" that the country is getting must be stopped. Pardon my "Cheney", meaning the "French" they use, but not the "heckuva job" that has been done.

But to the point, see CCR-NY.org or as I like to think:
Credence Clearwater Revolution- No Yoke Dot Org.
The Center for Constitutional Rights in New York is concerned that: now this is my spin but like the legislators in Germany held responsible for war crimes, that Congress should be careful in the clarity it provides.

Above and beyond the far fetched possibility that we would face any justice on the world stage, or rather below and deeper is the Constitution itself: Habeus corpus, warrantless spying and torture must be prevented or the terrorists will be the least of our problems.